Stirner on Spooks

What Stirner means by the term "spook" is not simply an abstract idea or concept (although it is that), but specifically a value-laden abstract idea or concept. A spook is not just an idea, but an ideal. A spook has perceived agency, requiring perceived goals and perceived values, and a spook possesses a person in such a way that the spook's ideals become their own ideals. This can be recognized in the way that spooks are so often described as spirits (which are perceived to have agency), and in the way the ideal of "Man" ("men" have agency) is another spook. All of these spooks, to be spooks, require some kind of imagined authority, because this authority is how the "spook" hijacks your values and gets you to act on its behalf. The idea of a "chair" would be a spook if anybody believed a chair to have authority. The idea of a throne is a spook if whoever sits on that throne has authority, but it is not a spook if spoken of only as an object, as a type of chair. The idea of a "hat" would be a spook if people believed a hat to have authority. The idea of a crown is a spook if whoever wears that crown has authority, but it is not a spook if spoken of only as an object, as a type of hat. The idea of a "ghost" has no authority, unless that ghost is called a god.

Here's what we learn from Stirner's use of "spook":

Stirner describes all of the following as "spooks":

The word "spook" appears 50 times in "The Ego and Its Own", here is a complete, numbered list of every time the word "spook" appears, linking to it so you can see its context, and giving a short comment on its usage.